June 2012 sees the Rio+20 Earth Summit. Sustainable development is a guise for Agenda 21, the action plan for Global Government and the New World Order.
Lord James of Blackheath: My Lords, I hope the minute that that has taken has not come off my time. I do not wish noble Lords to get too encouraged when I start with my conclusions but I will not sit down when I have made them. I will then give the evidence to support them and, I hope, present the reasons why I want support for an official inquiry into the mischief I shall unfold this afternoon. I have been engaged in pursuit of this issue for nearly two years and I am no further forward in getting to the truth.
There are three possible conclusions which may come from it. First, there may have been a massive piece of money-laundering committed by a major Government who should know better. Effectively, it undermined the integrity of a British bank, the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second possibility is that a major American department has an agency which has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which it is seeking to get at least €50 billion as a pay-off. The third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud, which has not been carried out, but which has been prepared to provide a threat to one Government or more if they do not make a pay-off. These three possibilities need an urgent review.
In April and May 2009, the situation started with the alleged transfer of $5 trillion to HSBC in the United Kingdom. Seven days later, another $5 trillion came to HSBC and three weeks later another $5 trillion. A total of $15 trillion is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland. We need to look to where this came from and the history of this money. I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and where it has come from for a long time.
It starts off apparently as the property of Yohannes Riyadi, who has some claims to be considered the richest man in the world. He would be if all the money that was owed to him was paid but I have seen some accounts of his showing that he owns $36 trillion in a bank. It is a ridiculous sum of money. However, $36 trillion would be consistent with the dynasty from which he comes and the fact that it had been effectively the emperors of Indo-China in times gone by. A lot of that money has been taken away from him, with his consent, by the American Treasury over the years for the specific purpose of helping to support the dollar.
Mr Riyadi has sent me a remarkable document dated February 2006 in which the American Government have called him to a meeting with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is neither the Federal Reserve nor a bank. It is a bit like "Celebrity Big Brother". It has three names to describe it and none of them is true. This astonishing document purports to have been a meeting, which was witnessed by Mr Alan Greenspan, who signed for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of which he was chairman, as well as chairman of the real Federal Reserve in Washington. It is signed by Mr Timothy Geithner as a witness on behalf of the International Monetary Fund. The IMF sent two witnesses, the other being Mr Yusuke Horiguchi. These gentlemen have signed as witnesses to the effect
16 Feb 2012 : Column 1017
that this deal is a proper deal. There are a lot of other signatures on the document. I do not have a photocopy; I have an original version of the contract.
My name is Benjamin Fulford. I am a spokesperson for the Black, White and Golden Dragon societies as well as for the Red and the Green. These ancient secret societies have a global command structure, partially visible in your local martial arts societies, that is capable of mobilizing a 100 million person army on very short notice in case of an emergency. These ancient societies have gone from dormant to semi-active mode because through the successful wiretapping of meetings of your elite, they have learned of plans to start World War 3, kill at least 4 billion people and destroy much of the Northern hemisphere. You may confirm with your Pentagon or CIA sources that this is all very real. The reason we are writing an open letter to you is to explain why the Federal Reserve -Board needs to be abolished and the global financial architecture needs to be revamped.
The degradation of the environment continues unchecked and pollutants continue to be recklessly dumped in the environment. For forty years globalist intent has assumed representation of the people of the Earth to further its own agenda – Agenda 21. This agenda entwines environment, economy and population growth behind a veil of illusion; climate change. Over those forty years Agenda 21 has not addressed the environmental concerns that it manipulates to its own end. This document clarifies the roots of Agenda 21 and reveals its cloak of sustainable development.
Read between the lies …
THE GREAT GREEN DECEPTION
Next year in 2012 Rio de Janeiro again hosts an Earth Summit. Twenty years on from the 1992 Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit, the 2012 event is being dubbed Rio + 20.
Rio+20 is in fact the short name for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. As an Earth Summit addresses environmental issues it is natural to assume that sustainable development relates to preserving a sustainable environment. It does not. Sustainable development is the banner of a drive for global government. The 2012 Earth summit website (earthsummit2012) is explicit about this fact: “One of the two main themes for the Earth Summit is the 'institutional framework for sustainable development'. Put more simply, this primarily refers to the system of global governance for sustainable development.”
In 1992 the Rio Earth Summit was in fact The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) and led to what is most commonly remembered as the outcome ‘The Rio Declaration’. The Rio Declaration consisted of 27 principles intended to guide future sustainable development around the world. It presents the illusion of an environmental concern; “Working towards international agreements which respect the interests of all and protect the integrity of the global environmental and developmental system.” When in fact it is simply carrying forward an agenda established at Stockholm on 16 June 1972.
The Failure of Authority to Command the Energy Crisis
The UK desperately needs a new energy strategy and could seize the opportunity of being the spearhead to a new attitude and approach to energy sourcing and security. Legislation, (Climate Change Act 2008), confines an energy approach focused on pollutant emissions and limits foresight and technological development by keeping attention fixed on current means of energy generation. The UK has no objective measure of its assets. Expanded into the geo-political arena the issues of energy sourcing and security are at the root of all trouble spots in the world. While the vision of a 'low carbon' infrastructure maintains a profit focus on cap and trade, or carbon taxing policies, development is equally confined to the profit opportunities of bio-mass and geothermal with token gesture towards hydro, wind, and solar energy. There is a complete disregard of the agricultural impact of bio-mass and blind ignorance of technological advance into clean, non-polluting energy sourcing, proven by inspired inventors.
After the hegemony of the oil industry following two world wars the UK no longer commands as much influence in energy strategy. If U.K. Energy Secretary Chris Huhne had the foresight of a realisitic energy future and were to seize the opportunity of new energy potentials, the UK could again lead the world into a new era of innovation and prosperity that would change the face of the whole world for the better in much the same way as industrial imperialism has changed the world for the worse. With a £200 billion vision of a low carbon (rather than a no carbon) infrastructure, a public debt of £1 trillion, a massive trade deficit, and foresight blinkered within current modalities the future is bleak as combustibles and nuclear energy generation are harmful in all respects. The UK's energy and economic policy relies on assumptions that are completely unrealistic and public communications offer a thin veneer of will to change.
